data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5317b/5317b292acce0b652e2627a2b52ca2501c064d06" alt="Scrivener and devonthink pro"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a943a/a943a8f85831b93c599741b4e2c58c52c9f20c7e" alt="scrivener and devonthink pro scrivener and devonthink pro"
#Scrivener and devonthink pro pro
I have both Curio Pro (a recent purchase) and DEVONthink Pro Office as well as Scrivener and Sente. There is a lot of information in Literature and Latte, DEVONthink, and Zengobi forums about integration and usage scenarios. I am just getting started with Scrivener, but I can tell you that a lot of people use DT for broader notes and clippings, then move the most relevant content to Scrivener. DT is tough to beat for the ease in which information can be poured in and sorted from a variety of sources. I have created templates for frequently used programs within DT, so it functions as a hub of an ecosystem of applications. Currently, I use DEVONthink much more along with separate dedicated apps such as OmniOutliner, NovaMind (awaiting Quicklook integration), KeyNote, Office, Tinderbox (Just getting my head around that one), etc. DEVONthink is more of a database, repository, and text analysis tool that can house a wide variety of file types (as can Curio). Curio is sort of a Swiss Army Knife knowledge management tool with many more visual tools including an integrated mind-mapping tool.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5317b/5317b292acce0b652e2627a2b52ca2501c064d06" alt="Scrivener and devonthink pro"